AIG Denies Life Insurance Claim for Iraq Vet
The parents of an Iraq war veteran have sued his insurance company after it refused to pay his life insurance. In the lawsuit filed in Kanawha Circuit Court in July, Stan and Shirley White of Cross Lanes maintain that, “Houston-based American General Life Insurance Co. wrongly denied them the proceeds from their youngest son’s life insurance policy.”
Andrew White joined the Marine Corps Reserve in July 2003, and served as a combat engineer, disarming “improvised explosive devices” and patrolling areas near Iraq’s border with Syria. Shortly after returning home from duty in September 2005, his older brother Bob, who was serving in the Army in Afghanistan, was killed when a rocket-propelled grenade hit the Humvee in which he was riding.
After the tragic death of his brother, Andrew decided to take out a $50,000 life insurance policy from AIG, with his parents as the sole beneficiaries. He wanted to avoid any financial burden for his parents if anything were to happen to him. After filling out the application, he was then examined by a health professional of AIG’s choosing on Oct. 31, 2006. AIG then issued the policy the following month and requested him to pay a higher premium because he was a smoker, which he agreed to. For fourteen and a half months he made his monthly payments.
Then in August 2007, Andrew was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and began treatment and medication that he took responsibly. Andrew sadly died in his sleep not long after being diagnosed. His toxicology screen said he had normal levels of his medication therefore ruling his death as accidental. However, when his parents submitted his death certificate to AIG, the insurer denied their claim.
AIG said, “that had they known that Andrew White had a car accident when he was 16 years old, they never would have written the policy to begin with.”
Jack Tinney, who represents the White family says, “[t]hat’s ludicrous. They have gone back and searched for any reason whatsoever to deny the claim, rather than look for a valid reason.” The lawsuit is seeking $50,000, which represents the full proceeds of the policy, plus unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
For more information click here.